Not a company story.
A people one.
We're product managers and engineers who lived the problem firsthand — context getting lost between a customer call and a shipped feature, scope changing without a record of who approved it. We're a small team building in the open about what we're learning, not a company with a polished origin story to sell.
The code was rarely the hard part. The planning was.
We've each spent years on the wrong side of this. Ran AI consulting and development company for six years; founded a seed-funded startup. Different companies, same failure.
Scattered by default
Requirements spread across calls, tickets and threads, with no single place that held them.
No record of decisions
Priorities moved without a trace of who moved them, or why they changed.
Context in one head
The detail that actually mattered never made it out of the person who knew it.
By the time a decision reached the engineers, half of it was already gone — every sprint a game of telephone. That gap doesn't just slow a team down. It compounds until it breaks one.
Coding agents didn't close it. They widened it. An agent builds exactly what it's told, faster than anyone can review — so an assumption nobody wrote down now ships before anyone notices it was an assumption.
So we built Enact.
See how it works →
NVIDIA Inception
Claude for Startups
Google for StartupsSee Enact on Your Workflow
Sign up for a working session. Bring a real spec, ticket, or Slack thread and we'll show how Enact turns it into an implementation-ready plan.
Real demo, your workflow
Bring a real spec, a Jira board, or a Slack thread. We'll show you exactly how Enact handles it.
Honest fit answer
If Enact is right for your team, you'll leave knowing exactly how to get started. If it isn't, we'll say so.